The Express Tribune

Aun Zara is a fresh, new comedy from the same team that made Aik Nayee Cinderella earlier this year. Based on Faiza Iftikhar’s novel Hissar e Mohabbat and directed by Haissem Hussain, the story revolves around two spoilt, only children who are desperately trying to escape their controlling families. Aun is tired of his family’s obsessive attention towards his personal life. Exhausted by their constant interference he complains bitterly to his friend Manzar:

“Yeh ghar nahin, ICU ward hai!” (This is not a house it’s an ICU Ward!)

Zara too wants an escape - anywhere or anything but the Navy career her military father has planned out for her. She asks her father:

“Tou, aam hona ghalat hai daddy?” (Is it wrong to be ordinary, daddy?)

These two meet, end up marrying each other and then go through all the foolish mistakes of courtship before they find the answers to their problems.

Although it is a laugh out loud comedy with countless one-liners, there is a serious thread woven into the fabric of the story. Aun is basically the product of a woman only household- he may not realise it but his father’s absence has left a gaping hole in his life. Similarly, Zara has been raised single-handedly by her military officer father and doting grandfather, played so well by Irfan Khoosat. She has not learned the small feminine tricks most females take for granted. The most splendid thing about this entire serial is the complete lack of moral fiber or introspection in either hero or heroine. Both are busy trying to manipulate every situation to satisfy their own ends. Osman Khalid Butt is simply brilliant as Aun. He has come a long way from his internet parodies of Humsafar and the slightly stiff looking Mayer in Aik Nayee Cinderella. Such a busy young man - writing scripts for films like Siyah, acting in dramas and taking part in literary festivals - he might just be our own desi version of James Franco, only much better looking. Zara is a wonderful mixture of sweet and tart that Maya Ali plays with great charm.

This is truly a next generation romance where the problems are more about a lack of maturity than any plotting mother-in-laws or aunts with agendas. My favourite scene so far had to be their wedding night. An unimpressed Zara chews gum to kill the boredom while her by now utterly disgusted looking groom Aun cannot be bothered to think of anything to say to make her like him. One of the great strengths of Faiza Iftikhar’s writing is her ability to create nuanced characters that we can all recognise from our daily lives. Aun’s loud but wise Punjabi grandmother, his sweet but sad Urdu speaking mother and his combative Phupo are all played perfectly by Nasreen Qureshi, Hina Bayat and Sabreen Hasbani respectively. Haissem Hussain has brought out the best from his entire team and moves the narrative along at a rapid pace giving it his signature ‘it should have been a movie’ look.

As in all great comedies, it’s all about the chemistry, that intangible spark that is so obvious when it’s lacking but hard to define when it’s there. Aun and his intellectually challenged friend Manzar (well played by Mukarram Kaleem) seem to have it by the bucketful. Their scenes are a treat to watch. No matter how dire a situation Aun is in, Manzar can be relied on to make it even worse with one hare-brained suggestion after another. Yet despite all the turmoil and confusion there is a strong vein of real affection between all the friends and family members, just as in real family, which binds them all together. After a spate of social message oriented and overtly ‘preachy’ serials, Aun Zara comes as a welcome relief. This is truly relaxing viewing for families especially around Ramazan. It does not patronise the viewer and if there is a theme, according to the writer it is:

“To value the relationships in our lives - otherwise life will teach us to value them."

Note: This serial will be played on the Indian Channel Zee TV after it finishes its run on Pakistan’s APlus channel. PHOTOS: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Aun-Zara/106882602835570 Read more by Sadaf here or follow her on @Tomtomatoe

If you live under a rock and are still unaware of the phenomenon that is the “Burka Avenger”, please check it out. The cartoon series is the story of a teacher, Jiya, who dons a stylised burka costume, becoming a super-heroine. Using her martial arts skills, the Burka Avenger fights evil, mainly to defend her students and the school she teaches at, from patriarchal goons who want to shut the school down. Not only was I impressed by the message of education for boys and girls, what pleasantly surprised me was that her choice of super-heroine costume - a black burka that covers her face and incorporates a cape - is very feminine. So not only does she kick ass, she kicks ass without conforming to the mainstream view that attributes physical strength to masculinity only. But while she’s being lauded as just what kids in Pakistan need, her burka is bothering people; specifically some liberal men. They see this as a promotion of the Islamic hijab and find it detrimental to the message of empowerment the show supposedly carries. To these men, “saving” women from patriarchy means that the burka or any other form of hijab should be banned altogether or discouraged at the very least. I know why this is happening. I myself was raised in quite a religious Muslim environment, so from the get go I used to believe that women should wear the hijab. Not just pious women or religious women, all women. Then, I grew older, read more, studied more, talked to more women and my views changed. I decided that I had been wrong. No, women should not wear the hijab under any circumstance, I believed. Not just 'liberal' or irreligious women, but even religious women. All women! But then I really wised up. I was able to put everything in context; the religious scriptures I had cherished when I was younger, the more philosophical mumbo jumbo that I educated myself with in my 20s, the conversations, the encounters and the incidents involving women who covered themselves, and that’s when it hit me,

“I’m a guy. Why should it matter what I think women should wear?”

So now I don’t care whether anyone wears it or not. But to be where I am now, I had to understand something critical to dismantling patriarchy. The natural trajectory for most men who discard their faith in a male-dominated social, religious, economic and political system is quite similar; it’s rarely - at least in the beginning - about nuance. It doesn’t immediately raise the question, “What specific mechanisms does patriarchy use to oppress women?”, but rather we first have to go through the immediate phase of, “It’s just wrong because it is.” In time, we slowly realise an important fact; the reason we stuck with patriarchy before wasn’t just upbringing, but the fact that it gave us privileges over women that we benefitted from; privileges in social standing, in education, in employment, even in marriage and raising kids. It’s great being a man in a patriarchal society as opposed to being a woman. The funny thing about privilege, though, is that as hard as it is to come by, it’s equally as hard to relinquish. So during that critical phase of just having discarded patriarchy, instead of going in search of the root causes of why patriarchy is wrong and how it works, we focus entirely on the tools that are borne out of those roots and enforce the system. Hijab or burka or whatever you might want to call it is simply a tool. In and of itself, it doesn’t do anything. It’s like any other article of clothing. Some women feel happy walking around in thigh high shorts, some like to wear jeans, some prefer miniskirts and others want to wrap themselves up in dark and baggy garments that cover their entire bodies including their faces, in essence, burkas and the sort. The reason patriarchy is wrong isn’t because it forces women to wear only the dark baggy garments and rejects everything else, it is wrong because it interferes with a woman’s choice at all. It’s wrong because whether a woman wants to wear a burka or a bikini, she has a right to do so as a human being - equal in standing with men. So when we men give ourselves the right to tell Jiya that she shouldn’t wear the burka to become a super-heroine, we’re assigning ourselves the same patriarchal privileges that we are supposedly working against. What she should or shouldn’t wear and how it affects other women’s decision to wear or not wear the burka is for her and for other women to choose for themselves. Our job, as men, is to respect those choices personally and work to get everyone to do the same. Dismantling patriarchy isn’t going to be achieved by opposing the tools of patriarchy alone, but rather figuring out what motivates those tools and then not just taking them away from the abusers, but thoroughly cleansing ourselves off it as well. This means relinquishing our privileges and giving up the right to tell women what they should or should not wear or do with their bodies or souls. Afterwards, when women have made those choices, respect them and their choices. Discarding patriarchy must begin with us discarding our unjust privilege of forcing our opinion on women. We can’t defeat the villain that is patriarchy if we still have residual villainy left in us. And if we fail at defeating our inner villains, then maybe the Burka Avenger should give us an ass-kicking too.

Aab Tak, a Pakistani television station started its transmission earlier this year with a strong statement,

‘Ladies, Gentlemen and She-males’

It did not take long for the station to air a sensational TV show Khufia where the hostess, Uzma Tahir, ignored people’s right to independence and a free life as she bullied them with a television camera. Chasing people frantically on the streets of Karachi, she and her team put hands on people, manhandled them and then barged into their homes with a camera crew to ask the victims of her camera bullying,

“Are you gay or transgender?”

The saddest part of the show occurred later when the hostess arrogantly ignored someone’s suicide threat. I couldn’t accept the fact that Uzma Tahir didn’t care about human life. Suicide is a preventable death and every suicide threat needs to be taken seriously. The most sickening moment came when she wishfully said,

“Why don’t these people become targets of bombs?”

One victim of her television camera abuse pleaded on air that he had some mental health issues and couldn’t talk about them. She tortured the poor soul by judging him and mockingly saying,

“How can a ‘crazy’ know that he is ‘crazy’ and even know his doctor? This is enough to prove that you are lying.”

It is a known fact that people with mental illness and non-conforming sexual behaviour are often victims of violence but it is quite rare to find sexual and psychological harassment by a television program crew. [embed width="620"]http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x18fsto_male-she-male-living-as-husband-wife-in-pakistan_news#from=embediframe[/embed] A so-called human right activist and physician, Ansar Burney, was invited to the program as an expert to discuss the issue. To a height of absurdity, Burney became paranoid and started inviting the charge that transvestites and transgender people could be agents of foreign countries and might be working as spies for different terrorist groups. The ‘expert’ on the program referred to transvestite and transgender orientation as ‘psychological misbehaviour’. I don’t know what this means as in my almost decade-long career in psychiatry, I have never heard or read this expression even once. In 2012, Pakistanis with gender non-conformity received an official status as ‘third-gender’ citizens. They are commonly and more loosely referred to as eunuchs (hijras, khawaja-sarra), hermaphrodites and transvestites. Contrary to Tahir’s personal belief, there is scientific data to support that these conditions happen genetically, not by choice. Clinically, they are different from each other. Gender Dysphoria (Gender Identity Disorder) describes the dissatisfaction some people have with their assigned gender at birth. Some, if resourceful, opt for sex change procedures. Transvestism, the practice of dressing and acting in a style or manner traditionally associated with the opposite sex, is different as is homosexuality where one is sexually aroused by members of the same sex. There are other hormonal and genetic situations in which patients can have ambiguous genitalia. Acting like the moral police, the hostess decided that it was her job to despicably warn the public to watch out for any early signs of their children being gay. Our media has started expanding its target audience. The Late Night Show with Begam Nawazish Ali, the Lollywood movie Bol and now the Pakistani version of ‘Glee’ are presenting evidence of non-heterosexual behaviour in our media, opening up a long secret aspect of our society. But sometimes sadly, multi-national companies find it acceptable to show a transgender victim of hazing in an all-boys college in an advertisement. Ironically, a June 2013 Pew Research survey showed Pakistan was one of the least gay-tolerant countries in the world while the same month the magazine Mother Jones published the results of a survey that put Pakistan as the world leader in the number of Google searches for gay sex links. I remember the case of Shumail Raj and Shahzina Tariq, a married couple who was jailed for three months for perjury after a dispute over the husband’s sex. The court ruled had that the husband was, in fact, a woman, despite sex-change surgery and that the couple had lied about his sexual status. It denied their claim of being married as their marriage was un-Islamic because it was same-sex. People with different sexual orientations and behaviours lead a very difficult and objected life in Pakistan. A television program like Khufia can risk many other lives. It is time to treat transgender and transsexual people with respect as fellow human beings. There is a need to accept their presence in society and to help them with education and employment in regular jobs. In the television program, I came across many of the victims requesting opportunities for honourable lives like everyone else in society. Unfortunately, their voices were ignored.

Following the uproar caused by the controversial episode of Abb Tak’s show, Khufia, where the host, Uzma Tahir, forced entry into the home of a transvestite couple and tried to film their life, many viewers decided to display their outrage over various platforms: some expressed their anger over social media with the help of Facebook and Twitter; others wrote blogs that were published online on The Express Tribune’s blog page. However, there were some that took a different route: many viewers decided to directly appeal to the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA). If one visits the official website of Pemra, there is a section under the tab ‘Complaints Call Centre’ labelled ‘View Complaints’. Upon clicking it, the website will direct the viewer to a particular page. This page will then show a list of channels and the number of complaints against them. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="508"] Photo: Screenshot from Pemra's website[/caption] There are 27 complaints against Abb Tak on Pemra’s website, most of them expressing outrage towards the episode in question. Following are a few of the complaints:

Complaint number 33387: “The show Khufia aired on December 15, 2013, was an infringement on privacy and was against basic human rights. Such shows in which the host harasses individuals, which have nothing to do with the public good, should not be allowed. Human rights and personal freedom should be protected by the state.” Complaint number 33351: “I am disgusted by Abb Tak and their show which violated the basic human rights of people by barging into their homes and invading their privacy. The channel has also endangered the lives of innocent people and should be severely warned from such behaviour in the future. The channel should be heavily fined for its behaviour.”

Pemra therefore is providing a platform where angered citizens can lodge their complaints regarding anything that is being aired by Pakistani TV channels. The procedure for lodging complaints is also fairly simply. Under the ‘Complaints Call Centre’ tab is the tab for ‘Lodging of Complaints.’ [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Screenshot from Pemra's website[/caption] This will open a page asking specifically for the medium one wishes to complain against. If the complaint is against a show on a television channel, then the ‘TV Channel’ button is to be clicked. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Screenshot from Pemra's website[/caption] This will lead to a form that asks for the name, CNIC number, city and phone number of the complainant. There is an optional box for anyone who wants to provide their email address as well. The next box will ask you to choose your channel. The form further asks for the specific complaint to be written in words, as well as suggestions for what action Pemra must take against the offenders. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="387"]

Photo: Screenshot from Pemra's website[/caption] So the next time you watch something on TV that is in violation of basic privacy rights, do complain about it and make your voice heard. It is your duty as a citizen to raise your voice as it is one way to create awareness. This post originally appeared here.

Indian soap operas and dramas have been airing on Pakistani television for a long time now. Pakistani women especially, have been largely influenced by these drama serials and this can be seen in the way Hindi words have seeped into our language and Indian clothing has become part of our fashion. Women not only want to buy Tulsi’s sari now, but to also, at times, address an unfortunate happening or a mishap as abshugan (Hindi for bad luck). The effects on our culture can be easily spotted. However, a few days back, I came across news that was thoroughly refreshing to hear; Pakistani dramas are being aired on an Indian channel called Zee Zindagi. Curious as to what people had to say about our dramas, I was pleasantly surprised to note that people were very appreciative of our shows, story-lines and actors. The overwhelming response indicated that the audience was looking forward to watching how Pakistani dramas portrayed real-life situations with characters that have depth and substance. A few responses on Twitter made me realise how much our dramas are being liked in India: https://twitter.com/MeghaMarwah/status/483307090513887233 https://twitter.com/bhodia/status/483239612236582912 Some even went on to compare Indian dramas with their Pakistani counterparts, discussing how the former should learn from the latter. https://twitter.com/mysticsrishti/status/483996159086571521 https://twitter.com/snehal_gandhi/status/483532496139587586 https://twitter.com/powerofyogesh/status/482907900969365504 This is something to be truly proud of. The Indian drama industry is renowned globally and their television artists are revered wherever they go. And if, after having such a huge soap opera industry, they have shown such kind of appreciation towards Pakistani dramas, it is a huge compliment to us and our media. Not only does this show that our dramas are meritorious but also evidences the amount of talent Pakistani possesses. The first Pakistani drama to be aired on the channel was Bashar Momin. The storyline following the life of a gangster in Karachi is a fresh concept for Indian audiences. Although there are a plethora of Bollywood movies around the same theme, curiosity to know how Pakistan gangster storylines are different from Indian storylines would be interesting. Besides this, it provides Indian audiences a much-needed break from the typical mother and daughter-in-law feuds that have ruled their screens for over a decade now. Zindagi Gulzar Hai, Aasmano Pe Likha, Aunn Zara and Kash Mein Teri Beti Na Hoti are a few others that are being aired on the Indian channel currently. The main reason most of these dramas are so well-received in India is because the storyline they follow is usually focused upon social issues. [embed width="620"]http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1zyiat_zee-launches-zindagi-channel-with-pakistani-content_tv[/embed] Pakistanis welcomed this as step in the right direction for both the nations and believe it will do well in portraying Pakistani culture globally: https://twitter.com/KhizM/status/481047078828011520 https://twitter.com/sharmeenochinoy/status/484638831082106880 https://twitter.com/MUsamaSiddiqui/status/484430727120158720 https://twitter.com/Ahmadpakistani/status/482210982089854976 https://twitter.com/AdabWaqar/status/476685116454879233 Pakistan’s image, for many countries, is largely coloured with terrorism, violence, deaths and destruction. Steps such as these, in which our true culture is portrayed in an amicable light, is something Pakistan needed to mend its broken image. This also encourages cordial ties between Pakistan and its neighbours; not only will this give both the countries a neutral platform to connect on, it will disperse many misleading notions of resentment that exist between the two neighbours. For years now, Pakistanis and Indians have been curious about life on either side of the border, this is a step in the right direction to bridge that gap felt by citizens of India and Pakistan. All in all, I applaud this step taken by the channel; it may be small, but it is a very significant one, towards cordial, bilateral relations.

Jutt and Bond was where most of us first saw Fawad Afzal Khan. He was a skinny, lanky, clean shaven guy with bangs. Soon after, we were surprised to see him as the lead singer of Entity Paradigm (EP), a Pakistani nu metal band, with his husky, soulful voice and that pained musician look. That was when we, the female population of Pakistan, said to one another,

“Hey, this guy’s not bad looking.”

But little did we know that he would soon be making waves and creating magic on TV and the big screen. By frequently featuring in commercials, a few songs and TV serials here and there, Fawad was slowly climbing the ladder of fame. His first film, Khuda Kay Liye, earned him critical acclaim for his role of a confused young man who falls into the claws of religious fundamentalists. Then one fine day in 2011, Fawad became Asher Hussain. That was when girls in Pakistan, and many older women too, kind of lost it. Then it was all Asher this and Asher that. Fawad not only played this character, in the TV serial Humsafar, he became the character. He was a compassionate, arrogant, loyal and absolutely beautiful man who loved his wife to the core. He befitted the definition of a ‘perfect man’ and we fell head-over-heels at every word he uttered from that gorgeously crooked mouth. Our love for Fawad followed to his next romantic drama, Zindagi Gulzar Hai, where again he played a stubborn, soulful and heart-meltingly adorable guy who is just the right amount of romantic. When the news of this hunk starring in a Bollywood movie reached our ears, our reaction was,

“Woah”

And that word or no words perhaps, will be good enough to describe the exhilaration we feel over Fawad crossing the border and acting in a movie that is surely a blockbuster and is giving him the global fame he surely deserves. Why? Well, of course, because this man is undeniably beautiful! But that’s not all. Here are 10 reasons why I think Fawad is so unquestionably yummy: 1. His eyes That piercing look he gives you – that could just make you cry... with joy. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="245"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 2. His music The way he plays the guitar and sings like his life depended on it. *melting* [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 3. His boy-next-door smile The way he looks down shyly, right before he looks up at you and flashes that dreamy smile. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="245"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 4. The way he blinks I bet you never thought blinking could look so seductive, did you? Well, look for yourself! [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 5. The ideal son-in-law He is the perfect guy to take home to your parents; with his honest, believable face and that ‘I’d do anything for you’ demeanour, I guarantee he would have your family bewitched. Yup, he’d totally burn his hand with hot chai to keep you safe. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="245"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 6. That stubble! OMG! OMG! OMG! That beard of his! How can facial hair look so incredibly stunning? [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="250"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 7. That swagger How he puts the entire screen on fire the minute he enters. Did I mention the suave beard? [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 8. The throaty chuckle The way he squints his eyes, breaks into a dashing smile and surprises you further with a hearty chuckle. Yup, we’re dying. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 9. What he wears Whether he wears a suit, a waistcoat or a sherwani, he always looks dapper as hell, with impeccably styled hair. Though I still prefer him in a sherwani. Yup, anyday. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="250"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 10. His modesty Though he’s taken over social media, and the hearts of all the girls in both Pakistan and India, Fawad remains humble and blushes every time he is praised. It’s adorable! [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"] Keep Calm and Stare at Fawad Khan

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] So, now you know why we’re hopelessly, helplessly and irrevocably smitten by him and his Greek god looks. Girls are dying to just be in the same room as him and boys (0bviously) want to be him. All of us counted the hours, minutes and seconds for his new movie... just to be able to look at him some more. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="245"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] After watching Khoobsurat, first day first show, I reacted to it, just as all the women in the cinema hall reacted to it, with a huge and heartfelt,

“Hayeee”

Although the movie has the stunning Bollywood actress, Sonam Kapoor, as the protagonist, it is Mr Khan that befits the title of the movie in every sense possible. [embed width="620"]http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x21u7tt_sonam-kapoor-fawad-khan-look-smashing-in-khoobsurat-trailer_news[/embed] Is the movie worth watching? Yes, definitely! But is it the best movie ever? No, not even close! The story is clichéd and annoyingly predictable. When you are introduced to all the characters, you can easily guess what each will do in the movie and how they'll end up. The plot revolves around a clumsy Dr Mili Chakravarty (Sonam Kapoor) and her many endeavors, as she takes up a project to treat a Rajasthan royal by the name of Shekhar Rathore (Aamir Raza). The Rathore family live in huge mansion and every thing about their lifestyle and mannerism signifies royalty. There is a lot of discipline in their house, administered by the royal wife Rani Nirmala (Ratna Pathak), and Dr Mili just can't seem to adjust to all the rules. Then she meets the prince, Yuvraj Vikram Rathore (Fawad Khan), and that's when things start to get interesting. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="595"]

Photo: Khoobsurat Facebook page[/caption] In the beginning, the pace was really fast and, personally, I think both Fawad and Sonam deserved a spicier entry (it is a Bollywood chick flick after all). Also, the scene where both their characters meet for the first time is abrupt. Had it been a stronger and funner meeting, their relationship would've seemed more interesting. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="595"]

Photo: Khoobsurat Facebook page[/caption] Another fun character was Dr Mili's mother Manju (Kiron Kher). As always, Kher plays a typically loud and overprotective Punjabi mother but she does the role justice and adds humour to the storyline. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="537"]

Photo: Khoobsurat Facebook page[/caption] Sonam's character was cute and her acting was pretty likeable this time round. While she was full of energy, Fawad's character was intense and sombre, which he played perfectly. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="476"]

Photo: Khoobsurat Facebook page[/caption] Many reviews say that Fawad overshadowed Sonam. Perhaps this is because Fawad's acting is different than a typical Bollywood actor's. Sonam is not a bad actress but her performance was not as natural and easy as Fawad made it his seem. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="595"]

Photo: Khoobsurat Facebook page[/caption] If you compare Fawad to Ali Zafar, who has also been trying his luck across the border, Fawad remains real on screen while Ali, although very talented, seems like he is trying to hard to impress the Indian audience and ends up crossing the line to ‘overacting’. This is why Ali Zafar would do well in comical roles whereas Fawad would excel in roles that highlight his raw and strong expressions. Popular Indian film critic Anupama Chopra described the movie,

“Khoobsurat is sweet, benign, and bland.”

The ending of Khoobsurat was typical, mediocre and, for a lack of a better word, lazy. Fawad is the saving grace of the movie and, all in all, money well spent. I’d surely recommend everyone to watch it. Here are five of my favourite moments from the film: 1. Fawad is as royal as a prince can be and, throughout the movie, Sonam shoves him around. It’s incredibly cute because he’s so skinny and often looks shaken when she shoves him. This is during a phase when he really doesn't like her; hence, his expressions are priceless. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 2. When Sonam confesses out loud to having dirty thoughts about him and he confesses the same to himself (in his head). They both are drunk, this scene is extremely adorable! [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 3. When he sees Sonam dancing in her pjs and is shocked by her craziness. Engine ki seeti is one of the best songs of the movie. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"] Keep Calm and Stare at Fawad Khan

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] [embed width="620"]http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x23cpia_engine-ki-seeti-official-video-song-khoobsurat-sonam-kapoor-fawad-khan_music[/embed] 4. How throughout the movie he hates that she wears short clothes and sits ‘inappropriately’. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="500"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] 5. The kisses – I like how they didn't make it gross and kept it adorably decent. As a random aunty sitting behind me in the cinema perfectly explained it,

“He didn't do real kissing because he is Pakistani.”

[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="245"]

Photo: Tumblr[/caption] For me, he is what will sell Khoobsurat to the viewers. I don’t about you guys, but I think Fawad has made this country, and us girls in particular, really proud. So make sure you watch this movie and get smitten by the beautiful phenomenon that is Fawad Khan.

Pakistan’s television industry has seen from amazing times – when classics such as Dhoop Kinarey charmed viewers all around the country as well as across the border – to the not-so-amazing times, when aunties gathered around television screens for nothing better than ‘saas-bahu’ soaps. Fortunately, the growth in television productions has recently been phenomenal, with dozens of serials airing on the ever growing number of television channels in the country. As the entertainment industry expands, its impact on society surpasses the mere purpose of entertaining. It begins to highlight social issues and influences thinking and behaviour among the population. A ton of storytelling on Pakistani television today pinpoints the plaguing issues our people continue to face, dowry being one of them. However, the realisation of road safety as an issue still remains insignificant. According to WHO,

“Seat belts reduce the risk of a fatal injury by up to 50% for front seat occupants, and up to 75% for rear seat occupants.”

The same report, published in 2013, notes that Pakistan’s seat belt laws are short of being comprehensive, that is, they do not cover both front seat and rear seat occupants. Even for the laws in place, enforcement remains low. We’ve all seen cab drivers pretending to wear seat belts to avoid being ‘caught’ by traffic police in the federal capital by simply putting on a belt with no buckles at the end. It is a commonly held notion in our country that Pakistanis are forced to learn road safety rules after having travelled to countries such as the United States, Britain and Canada, where the law enforcement on such issues remains strong. Yet, as soon as they exit the airport, after landing in Pakistan, their actions return to breaking traffic signals, over speeding and not letting seat belts infringe upon our ‘independence’. A small segment of our urban population does, however, emphasise on the use of seat belts as a necessary practice of our daily routines and an even greater responsibility rests on their shoulders to spread the message among their family and friends. So how does the television medium come into play with road safety? As the scope of our TV productions has moved beyond studios to real homes and offices, a tremendous number of scenes are also shot in cars. Cars are the new living room. Characters cover everything from worries of not being able to convince their parents to agreement of their marriages to receiving urgent phone calls. Yet, I am still waiting to come across one scene where folks in the car are wearing seat belts. One can’t help but notice that shows shot in Pakistan largely follow this trend, whereas serials shot abroad do have actors wearing seat belts as an everyday practice. Shouldn’t it be the same in Pakistan as well? The reason I focus my attention on TV serials is because television possesses the ability to break through the socioeconomic divide and is thus responsible to spread awareness and set role models. We have witnessed warnings next to scenes where actors are smoking, yet road safety remains largely ignored. Not wearing a seat belt is a cultural norm in Pakistan, one that hardly changes across socioeconomic levels. I cringe every single time one of our actors is shown driving a car without having fastened their seat belts and all occupants follow suit. Car rides with seat belts on are not minimal; they are practically non-existent on television. I encourage our television producers, directors and actors to bring this matter to the forefront and ensure the use of seat belts in all Pakistani television shows. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) could also be a prominent player in inducing this change. I expect such a move to not only enhance safety for the cast and crew but to trigger a societal response. Men, women, girls and boys all around the world, for the lack of a better expression, imitate their television, film and music role models for their dressing and behaviour. Boutiques create and market a variety of popular dresses worn by actors and actresses. The same goes for jewellery designs. A similar awareness campaign is reflected in warnings that go hand in hand with cigarette advertisements. The smoking-is-so-cool narrative is followed by its not-so-cool damaging health effects. Seat belts could share a similar narrative. Let’s make wearing one the-new-cool!

Rasm-e-Duniya, starring Armeena Rana Khan, Samina Peerzada, Sami Khan and Bilal Abbas, has faced a lot of criticism from audiences for resorting to the familiar trope – the dukhiyaari damsel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXTzVzn31Ec Let’s break down the play. The protagonist is Haya (Armeena Khan) who is pressured into marrying Harib (Sami Khan) by her family. But the situation takes an ugly turn since Haya and Harib’s elder brother, Farris (Bilal Abbas), were in love with each other. Mussarat (Samina Pirzada) is Farris and Harib’s mother, and was incidentally in love with Haya’s father, Tabrez. Since Mussarat was unable to marry Tabrez, she is extremely bitter and wants everyone around her to be as miserable as she is. Thus, she decides to stop Haya from marrying the love of her life. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Photo: Facebook[/caption] Resultantly, Farris is heartbroken after seeing the love of his life being wed to his brother. Thus, he decides to do the classic dukhi hero thing – wallow. Instead of going back to London, he decides to stay in the city and stalk his former girlfriend (what a picture of mental health) and ends up finding a stalker friend in return who is none other than Haya! Haya the Stalker is beautifully silly. The character is extremely ill-developed so far and was recently found narrating the tale of her parents’ divorce with statements like,

“My father never stopped my mother from doing anything, but she decided to get a divorce because my father wouldn’t let her start her own business.”

Can someone explain logic and feminism 101 to her, because I can’t. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"]

Photo: Screenshot[/caption] Haya the Wife has her own problems. Her husband Harib is a complete nutcase. On the night of their wedding, he throws a fit and tells her to stand in the corner. Over the next couple of days, he throws fit after fit over the smallest things. This one time he commanded her to walk up and down the stairs for not telling him where she had gone. In another episode, he makes her stand on the table with a phone charger wire between her teeth because he thought she was lying to him. He’s basically someone who should be institutionalised but is roaming around freely, destroying a woman’s life because no one cares if a man is mentally unfit. All the society cares about is if a man is of a marriageable age and has a place he can call home. Despite the fact that Harib is a medical doctor, he has no awareness of his mental disturbance and continues to inflict psychological torture upon Haya the Wife. Haya’s parents are poor and sick, and their other daughters are not exactly doing well with their respective in-laws. In swoops Mussarrat and decides to sprinkle salt over their wounds. She meddles in the other daughters’ affairs and ends up causing enough trouble to ruin their respective marriages. Haya, on the other hand, has no choice but to stick it out with the deranged Harib. Now there are many problems with the subplots as many parts of the show just do not make sense. Conversely, what does make perfect sense and is actually quite an astute observational depiction on the part of the writer is the relationship between Haya the Wife and Harib the Deranged. Imran Nazir skillfully points out the dynamics and the mental incapacities of a man who is inflicting emotional abuse on his wife. He is clearly insecure and lacks the ability to trust. He is a stepchild and seems to have learnt very maladaptive behaviours that he takes out on Haya. One minute he is hot and the next cold, leaving poor Haya extremely afraid and confused. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"]

Photo: Facebook[/caption] Armeena pulls off this role with surprising adeptness. She is seen as fearful and perplexed as she tries to make the best out of a truly horrifying situation, while her counterpart Sami is also quite convincing as Harib the Deranged. Resultantly, there is absolutely nothing wrong with their performance or deliveries. We find out that Haya was studying to be an MBBS doctor before her parents stopped her from completing her education and had her married off. There seems to be little emphasis on this line of reasoning as to why Haya doesn’t attempt to regain her educational track. In one scene, her mother asks her if Harib will let her resume her education yet she deflects the question. Tabrez, who is recovering from a stroke, would rather see his daughter suffer in a terrible situation than give her back the chance to live a fulfilled life. Therefore, on one hand, the criticism that dramas only show weepy women is somehow correct. Haya the Wife is always weeping and morose because her husband is crazy. That said, it does not mean that there are no signs of emotional abuse. A lot of women suffer silently through abuse because of similar, if not completely the same, pressures that Haya faces in the serial. Another important topic with reference to this drama is acknowledging mental health issues in males in Pakistan. There is so much stigma regarding men seeking psychological help that this does not allow much room in tackling the problems that male abusers face. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"]

Photo: Screenshot[/caption] Harib clearly has mental health issues that should be addressed, but as long as a man is able to ‘keep up appearances’, no one really questions what is going on in their heads or behind closed doors. It’s clear that Harib’s mother also requires therapy; she kind of reminds me of Miss Havisham, the woman who drenched herself in tawdry finery and was apparently ‘beautiful’ but truly bitter on the inside. All this could have been delivered through a stronger message. However, the misogynist subplot of Haya dissing her mother and Tabrez the Majboor acting as an onlooker instead of taking action is what makes the story a disappointment. There are many women like Haya the Wife who suffer through emotional abuse yet never raise their voices. So the criticism that, “Hey, this doesn’t happen! Why do our dramas show it?” is a bit unfair. However, the criticism that, “Why do our dramas always have to show a damsel in distress?” is a fair, fair assessment. Script-writers often rely on comfortable stereotypes and plots are often based on quick emotional tearjerkers rather than the reality of the Pakistani society. Rasm-e-Duniya is still making an important point regarding emotional abuse; that it happens, that it’s real and women suffer because of it. Yet it seems to lose out on this notion by resorting to cheap and expedient emotional buyouts and leaving a lot of questions unanswered.

Aah, Ramazan.

Shaan-e-Ramazan. Ehtram-e-Ramazan. Naimat-e-Ramazan.

Sounds nice, doesn’t it?

Hold your horses. Because in few minutes it will be,

“Moti moti auntiyaan kidhar hain?” (Where are all the fat aunties?) “Aam khaye ga aam?” (Do you want to eat mango?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOIJZSFJidE And my personal most favourite,

“Who are you to question Jinnah?”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP8e-2HEIb4 Pakistani television shows during Ramazan are complete madness. And anyone who has had the displeasure of watching these shows would agree that each year they try to outdo their own madness and each year they succeed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyvWqPbsggM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbVrchJrQ3Y From giving away children to planes, Aamir Liaquat is on some kind of unreal dare to prove that shock value generates money. Forget ethics or standards of entertainment, he can use religion and patriotism to pull off any gimmick and his target audience would lap it up. You can’t blame the audience. His market is the struggling 9-5 working, 'would gladly jump through an ocean of vermicelli' to get a motorcycle, class. I don’t blame them for doing whatever they can to win a bar of gold. Do you even know what a bar of gold could do for them? It could let them breathe easier for another few months. Do you know what a motorcycle could do for them? It could finally ease their lives because they won’t have to take those crowded buses to work every morning, hanging by the rails, running to catch it as it speeds off bus stops. I don’t blame this audience at all. Who is completely to be blamed for this madness are the channels and the networks and the producers and the ‘creative’ managers who decide what competition is ludicrous enough to create a carnivalesque scene on television. What would drive the audiences into hysterics? A person calmly discussing their deeds in Ramazan, or the sight of two people struggling to get out of a pool of Rooh Afza while tied to each other – just to get that scooter? Hilarious! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKE5Nv9CQwI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJSXZnHMUPc The next big bizarre Jekyll-Hyde transformations that happen on television are the celebrities that take up a garb of piety. We all remember how Veena Malik wanted to do astaghfar with us. Now I don’t have a problem with anyone taking their deen (religion) along with dunya (world) because both of these things can and should exist in a continuum, but some of these people just overdo the whole piety angle. Especially since this ‘piety’ has nothing to do with actually doing good to or for people, rather it’s, like everything else, about selling their products. It’s about raking in the numbers. Who cares if they’re almost entirely built upon fooling people into thinking this is actual ‘entertainment’? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq95J_S_U1g What’s great is that there are people from this industry who are vocal about their disdain for this madness. Mansha Pasha, who starred in Chalay Thay Saath and gained critical acclaim for her performance, talked about this recently in an interview where she states that many artists exploit the month of Ramazan just for the sake of garnering ratings, but she does not agree with this practise.

“I have gotten a lot of offers to be part of Ramazan shows and make guest appearances but I didn’t do them because I don’t agree with this ideology. There are so many question marks in this entire thing. Honestly, it seems as though Ramazan has nothing to do with religion anymore.”

I couldn’t help agreeing with her stance. Pasha goes on to make another important point about how the weak woman is considered the heroine in Pakistani dramas. There is a consistent lack of strong female protagonists in Pakistani dramas which has often been lamented by many commentators such as myself. However, mainstream actresses rarely come out to condemn this practice. Considering that this industry isn’t kind to outspoken, individualistic opinions, even less so when it comes from a woman, it is quite brave of Pasha to talk about these hypocrisies of our mainstream actors, actresses and other celebrities. Perhaps if more influential people spoke out against these silly practices, someone would start taking notice. The audiences would start getting the idea that hey, we’re better than this. We’re all better than this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd7FByPiSGU Ramazan is not just a month for gluttony and TV shows, it is a month where we’re all supposed to be a little more tolerant than the rest of the year. Fasting is supposed to teach us restraint, compassion for those who are less fortunate than us, and help us appreciate the things we already have in our lives. What these shows do is completely in the opposite direction of what the actual spirit of Ramazan is. What these shows do instead is turn Ramazan into a gaming opportunity and a marketing ploy. The shows and the media houses earn millions at the cost of the self-respect and identities of so many Pakistanis. This is also lazy and uncreative. Surely, production and media houses can find ways to entertain people without resorting to these tactics. Surely, there is a way to attract numbers and make commercial sense without selling someone’s self-respect. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31T6ObJxjkw It is my hope, like Pasha’s, that in the future, someone somewhere can rethink this whole structure of creating circuses in the name of piety and goodwill. I hope we can do more charity in Ramazan shows (it’s better to flaunt about helping people rather than shoving them in a tub of colourful water anyway). We need more ways to become tolerant and peaceful (the need of the hour, really) and teach each other compassion and empathy for those who are less fortunate than us, instead of using them to make more money for the already rich celebrities.

For much of the 2018-19 season, Real Madrid’s campaign has been driven by pessimism and trepidation. From mediocre performances on the field to a lack of purpose off it, the Los Blancos found themselves entrenched in a diatribe with a swathe of negative opinions from fans and critics alike. But the return of the clubs’s favourite son Zinedine Zidane after his dignified exit nine months ago has cut through all the noise, at least for the time being. Zizou’s work is cut out for him as the rebuilding job at a club like Real Madrid, with extremely high expectations, won’t be an easy task by any stretch of the imagination. https://twitter.com/kevinchimuka/status/1113392173150502914 However, unlike towards the end of his last tenure, Zidane will have financial backing from the club. A report from The Independent claimed “Real Madrid president Florentino Perez has promised Zidane an expensive overhaul,” immediately after the Frenchman’s arrival. A few days later L’Equipe’s front page (titled Casino Royal) stated that: “Perez is ready to show faith in Zidane to turn the ship around by giving him a €500 million summer budget.” If Madrid are keen on spending heavily in the upcoming summer transfer window, they will have to do it wisely, bearing in mind their current expectations and without compromising future ambitions. Defence Real Madrid’s defence is, arguably, the least concerning aspect of their squad. Sergio Ramos and Raphael Varane might not have had the best of seasons, but they still form a formidable pairing in the centre of defence. But with Ramos aging and especially if Varane decides to leave, Madrid would need adequate replacements in order to beef up their backline options. Looking at the options, three names stand out in particular. These include Napoli’s Kalidou Koulibaly (27), Inter Milan’s Milan Skriniar (24) and Ajax’s Matthijs de Ligt (19). [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Kalidou Koulibaly during the Serie A match between US Sassuolo and SSC Napoli at Mapei Stadium - Citta' del Tricolore on March 10, 2019 in Reggio nell'Emilia, Italy. Photo: Getty[/caption] All three have no obvious weaknesses and possess the ideal skill set expected from a defender (strength, positioning and ball playing skills), supplemented by the fact that they are young enough to be part of the club for a very long time. While Madrid would be happy to bring in any one of these players, Skriniar would be cheaper as compared to the other two, considering the absence of a release clause in his contract with Inter. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Milan Skriniar of FC Internazionale competes for the ball with Danny da Costa of Eintracht Frankfurt during the UEFA Europa League Round of 16 Second Leg match between FC Internazionale and Eintracht Frankfurt at San Siro on March 14, 2019 in Milan, Italy. Photo: Getty[/caption] The 24-year-old also offers an added dimension of having played as a defensive midfielder with the Slovakian national side, and consequently can provide cover on two positions while also aiding in-game tactical switch. Midfielders Real Madrid have a substantial amount of talent in the centre of the park, with an impressive blend of young (Marcos Llorente, Fede Valverde and Dani Ceballos) and experienced players (Luka Modric, Toni Kroos and Casemiro). In order to cater to an aging Modric and take off pressure from Kroos, Madrid need a couple of additions to their midfield. However, they don’t need to spend heavily in this regard as the players they have loaned out – James Rodriguez to Bayern Munich and Mateo Kovacic to Chelsea – will be ideal suitors. Rodriguez’s incisiveness in the final third, both in open play and dead ball situations, will add creativity in central positions. This is of particular importance because a majority of Madrid’s attacks are wing-based, which is why the Colombian’s presence will stretch opposing defences and bring more unpredictability going forward. Also, through his quotes in the press, the midfielder has also indicated that there is no love lost between him and the Spanish giants, despite being left frustrated for playing time under Zidane previously. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] James Rodriguez of FC Bayern Muenchen controls the ball during the Bundesliga match between FC Bayern Muenchen and 1. FSV Mainz 05 at Allianz Arena on March 17, 2019 in Munich, Germany. Photo: Getty[/caption] Kovacic might not have had the best of seasons at Chelsea, but he can still play a vital role in The Whites midfield with his ability to play line-breaking passes; a trait which is of pivotal importance, especially against many La Liga sides who like to sit deep and defend. Also, the Croatian’s best time in Madrid colours came while playing under Zizou, which makes a strong case of having him back in the Spanish capital. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Mateo Kovacic of Chelsea in action during the FA Cup Fifth Round match between Chelsea and Manchester United at Stamford Bridge on February 18, 2019 in London, United Kingdom. Photo: Getty[/caption] Forwards Ever since the departure of club legend Cristiano Ronaldo, the talk surrounding Real Madrid’s attacking pedigree has shown no signs of subsiding. Since the departure of the Portuguese, the goals have significantly dried up for the Los Blancos and hence the need for some clinical finishers in front of the goal is, probably, more than ever. Talking about forwards, one player that has constantly been linked with Real Madrid is Chelsea’s Eden Hazard. Although there is no doubt about the Belgium international’s footballing prowess and he will also be a seamless fit at Real, signing him now, at the age of 28, would mean the club shelling a lot of money in return for only two to three peak years. While it would be unfair to totally rule out a move, the club should only consider Hazard as a fall-back option. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] 31st March 2019, Cardiff City Stadium, Cardiff, Wales; EPL Premier League football, Cardiff City versus Chelsea; Eden Hazard of Chelsea looks back at a missed chance. Photo: Getty[/caption] Moving on, Paris Saint-Germain’s (PSG) Kylian Mbappe, despite being an ideal solution to Real Madrid’s goal scoring troubles, is a long shot considering his massive price tag. Although there are plenty of rumours in the transfer market regarding his move to Spain, the French club will go all out to keep the 20-year-old star at the club, keeping in mind the fact that he is at the core of their European ambitions. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Kylian Mbappe of PSG celebrates a goal during the Ligue 1 match between Paris Saint Germain and Guingamp at Parc des Princes on January 19, 2019 in Paris, France. Photo: Getty[/caption] Taking into account all the factors and realistic options available on the market, Real Madrid will be better off if they work on the lines of signing Liverpool’s Sadio Mane and Inter Milan’s Mauro Icardi. Mane’s pace and technical ability has been part and parcel of Liverpool’s success in the past couple of seasons, and he will add a lot of potency to Real Madrid’s attack. Although he has played mostly as a winger for The Reds, if need be, he can play in a more central role as a striker as well. In Mane, Madrid will find a willing worker, who can track back and help out with defence and also link up well with Marcelo Vieira on the left wing. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Sadio Mane of Liverpool FC runs with the ball during the Premier League match between Liverpool FC and Tottenham Hotspur at Anfield on March 31, 2019 in Liverpool, United Kingdom. Photo: Getty[/caption] On the other hand, Icardi has stacked up some great numbers for his Italian club with his lethal finishing. He may not participate much in build-up play but his positioning and movement in front of the goal is particularly impressive. Real Madrid have been guilty of creating lots of chances but not converting them during the ongoing season, but Icardi’s signing should go a long way in changing that. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Mauro Icardi of FC Internazionale scores the second goal during the Serie A match betweenGenoa CFC and FC Internazionale at Stadio Luigi Ferraris on April 3, 2019 in Genoa, Italy. Photo: Getty[/caption] To Madrid and Zidane’s advantage, being knocked out of the title race on all fronts is somewhat a blessing in disguise, as it gives them additional time to plan for the future. But the 13-time European Champions will have to be clever with the way they go about their business in the transfer market, before it builds up more scar tissue against their name as a formidable force in the world of football.

The United States has introduced a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution to blacklist Masood Azhar as an international terrorist. Azhar is the leader of Jaish-e-Mohammed (banned in Pakistan since 2002) and has been blamed by India for masterminding February’s Pulwama incident, even though no evidence has been produced which links Azhar to the incident. China has refused to list Azhar as an international terrorist after careful consideration of the definition of international terrorism according to international law. China has made this position absolutely clear and as such, it would appear that the US is looking to transform the UNSC into a place of high stakes geopolitical theatre, because China’s veto of the US resolution is inevitable. The US therefore is using the internationally immaterial issue of Azhar in order to provoke tensions between China and India at a time when the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is already invoking blood-curdling Sinophobia in further attempts to rally the jingoist Hindutva vote. But this is not all that the US is doing. Washington is also provoking and in fact insulting Pakistan by suggesting that a local matter is worthy of wasting the UN’s time, even after one of the permanent members of the Security Council has made its position unambiguous. As if on cue, India’s jingoistic media kicked into high gear suggesting war against China. Meanwhile, members of the BJP and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) continue to call for a boycotting of Chinese goods. When it comes to Pakistan however, America’s willingness to inflate the international importance of Azhar makes it clear that the US is willing to risk productive relations with Pakistan in order to both placate India and to goad India into an even more extreme position vis-a-vis China (not that the BJP needs much help in this respect). Although the US has admitted that Pakistan’s role in the Afghan peace process is crucial, beyond this, the US has clearly made its decision in terms of a long term strategy in South Asia. While some US diplomats will feign attempts at a balanced South Asia policy, the reality is that India is now a key US strategic partner. US diplomats at the UN will happily do India’s bidding, even over a matter as absurd as trying to convince the world that Azhar is an international terrorist when legal precedent says otherwise. Pakistan must adjust its own expectations accordingly. While it would be imprudent for Pakistan to provoke any superpower, the message that Washington is not so subtly sending is that when it comes to a superpower partner, China is the singular key to Pakistan’s prosperous future, while the US is becoming little more than a puppet master helping direct flagrant Indian aggression against China. This is all the more reason for Pakistan to take a more assertive role in the Afghan peace process. As the country most directly affected by Afghanistan’s prolonged status as a failed state, Pakistan has no excuse not to emerge as an international leader in driving forward an all-parties peace process. Any idea that Pakistan should merely shadow the US in respect of the peace process should now be put to rest, as it is clear that the US has India’s strategic desires at heart and that, by comparison, Pakistan’s security needs come a very distant second or even third. The reality Pakistan must now face is that whilst America’s priorities in the South Asia during the 80’s related to containing Afghanistan to the West and the Soviet Union to the North, today the US is squarely focused on provoking China and for this, India will remain a key ally of Washington. All that Pakistan must now do is acclimate itself to a new reality where China’s all-weather friendship will grow in stature and material importance while the US will be willing to insult, debase and ignore Pakistan as though the events of the 80’s never occurred. This post was originally published here.

Following the Marvel path, The Conjuring universe has grown steadily over the last six years through both, the increasing returns that most films in the franchise have delivered and in stature through the critical acclaim that the first two Conjuring movies received. Now five movies in, the franchise is showing no signs of slowing down with a third Conjuring film already set for 2020. But before that, we’re getting another Annabelle movie. And this one promises to be much different than its predecessors. [caption id="attachment_81026" align="alignnone" width="600"] Photo: IMDb[/caption] Annabelle Comes Home, which will serve as the sixth film in the Conjuring franchise and the third Annabelle film, does not take the prequel route like Annabelle: Creation did. Unlike the first Annabelle, which was widely panned for being a rudderless and aimless production, this film shifts the focus directly towards the Warren family – the paranormal investigators played by Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga who served as the protagonists of the first two Conjuring films. [caption id="attachment_81027" align="alignnone" width="600"] Photo: IMDb[/caption] The first trailer, which came out recently, sprinkles a handful of jump-scares throughout its two and a half minute runtime and the film more or less appears to centre on an artefact room where the Warrens keep the demonic doll. However, soon enough the doll begins turning up in strange places and much to the surprise of the Warrens, so do the other artefacts. The weight of this is felt by the Warren’s 10-year-old daughter, Judy, and her friends who seem to be at the centre of the latest Conjuring film. [caption id="attachment_81024" align="alignnone" width="598"] Photo: IMDb[/caption] By all accounts, Annabelle Comes Home seems like a much more small-scale film as compared to its predecessors which were much more expansive in scope. And though the Warrens are back, they don’t seem to have a central role in the film in the same way as their daughter does. This is promising because it means that perhaps this time the focus will be on a tightly-constructed narrative, which is where horror films work best. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Photo: Screenshot[/caption] As evidenced by the trailer, it’s perhaps also safe to assume that this film won’t just be about the titular doll but will also focus on some of the other haunted artefacts in the Warren family’s possession which, if anything, may provide the producers with a few more ideas for some future spin-offs. In the context of this film though, it will undoubtedly add to the scares. This is something that producer James Wan has confirmed when he essentially described the film as being Night at the Museum with an evil doll because of the various haunted artefacts that will be activated in the film. [caption id="attachment_81031" align="alignnone" width="600"] Photo: IMDb[/caption] The good thing is that Annabelle Comes Home seems to channel all the elements that have made the Conjuring franchise such a big success, which provides the viewer with something to look forward to. After straying away from the central narrative and focusing on aimless origin stories, the franchise seems to have finally learned its lesson. With Annabelle Comes Home, the focus seems to have been shifted back towards the scares and, in a blatant but smart bit of fan-service, the filmmakers have brought back two of the franchise’s most beloved characters, even if it’s in a supporting capacity. That said, only time will tell if the latest installment in the Annabelle saga matches up to the Conjuring movies, which at present, stand head and shoulders above the other films in the franchise. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Photo: Screenshot[/caption] Annabelle Comes Home hits cinemas on June 28, 2019.

“Our message is stronger than ever. Please stop the fighting. Please stop the killing. Please drop your guns.” Juan Antonio Samaranch, President International Olympic Committee speaking at the Winter Olympics, 1994. The sports arena has often been used in modern-day diplomacy to advocate for peace, but it has also been used to aggravate existing conflict. George Orwell wrote in The Sporting Spirit (1945) that sports is “war, minus the shooting” and has the potential to bring out the worst characteristics of nationalism. How that is controlled, or even amplified, is in the hands of those who hold the political controls. In the days following the Pulwama incident, tensions once again began to escalate between Pakistan and India. While India’s very first reaction was the imposition of a heavy economic sanction, many of the responses which followed came in the form of sports sanctions, primarily impacting something very close to the hearts of people on both sides: cricket. The fourth edition of the Pakistan Super League (PSL) became the primary target of the increasing hostility and vitriol. Prominent Indian-owned media companies and broadcasters, including IMG Reliance, D Sports and CricBuzz, terminated their contracts and coverage of the tournament, leading to a virtual PSL blackout in India. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) also came under extraordinary pressure from prominent Indian sporting personalities, media outlets and ordinary citizens, to boycott the upcoming Pakistan-India match at the cricket World Cup (June 2019). https://twitter.com/YusufDFI/status/1097384109200928768 https://twitter.com/MinhazMerchant/status/1099007211689467906 Outside of cricket, other sports have also been effected. It is suggested that Pakistan supplies 90% of the hockey sticks used in India, and would suffer heavily from an increase in customs duty of 200%. As a result, the hockey fraternity in India would have to quickly find new suppliers who could match the demand, as well as replicate the quality from across the border. The Shooting World Cup, which was taking place in New Delhi a week after the attack and was intended to be an Olympic qualifier, also got dragged into the conflict when Pakistani athletes were not granted visas to participate in the tournament. Further economic sanctions would come later, followed by military responses, but it appears that the use of sports sanctions was going to kick start this ‘Operation Isolation’. However, these sanctions did not prove to be effective in isolating Pakistan on the sports field. We saw the PSL replace its distributors almost immediately and have yet another successful edition. Regarding the World Cup, wide coverage of the discussions between the BCCI and the International Cricket Council (ICC) were made public, including copies of the communication between the two bodies. It is clear that the ICC and the organising team of the World Cup do not condone any political battles being played out on the cricket pitch. https://twitter.com/TimesNow/status/1098065107693625344 Perhaps the most surprising stance came from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in response to Pakistan’s plea regarding the Shooting World Cup. Not only did the IOC revoke the tournament of its Olympic qualification status for the particular discipline, they further went onto suspend all discussions with the Indian government regarding hosting future sporting events in India. The IOC also recommended that all international federations should refrain from hosting any international sporting events in India until written guarantees are provided assuring participation of all athletes. This may prove to be a landmark ruling from the Olympic governing body, which has traditionally not taken such a publicly strong stance on political matters. This is especially true as the initial plea was only to do with the shooting event. However, India is no doubt going to work to revoke this suspension as quickly as possible, even if it means salvaging its ties with Pakistan. Failure to do so could mean that a number of its hosting rights and bids would be up on the chopping block, including the FIFA Under-20 Women’s World Cup (2020), the Hockey World Cup (2022/2023) and ICC Cricket World Cup (2023), among others. https://twitter.com/mehreenzahra/status/1098830460862558208?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1098830460862558208&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fblogsdesk.tribune.com.pk%2Fapplication%2Fwp-admin%2Fpost.php%3Fpost%3D80906%26action%3Dedit This of course is not the first time tensions have escalated between the two neighbours, nor is it the first time that the field of play is used for sanctions to be deployed and political statements to be made. India-Pakistan cricket relations have been turbulent ever since they kicked off in 1952. There have been many positive outcomes where both countries have hosted each other on multiple occasions and opened up their borders for citizens to travel in support of their teams. At the same time, boycotts from governing bodies and protests from ordinary citizens have also had the opposite impact on cricket and other sporting ties between the two nations. The Indian cricket tour to Pakistan (2004) is considered as one of the four most prominent acts of sports diplomacy, with the ‘Christmas Truce’ of World War I (1914), where German and British soldiers were said to have held informal sessions of casual football on Christmas day, being number one. Even outside of the subcontinent, sports have always been a feature of international diplomacy, albeit a more subtle one. We have seen countless protests and boycotts when it comes to international sports, such as the Black Power Salute (at the 1968 Olympics), America’s boycott of the 1980 Olympics during the Cold War, the Soviet Union’s boycott of the 1984 Olympics, and the international sporting boycott of Apartheid South Africa. However, it would not have been difficult to foresee the potential for sports to have these impacts when the Olympic movement was first initiated. After all, it was developed on the sole idea of using sports to encourage and improve peace among the warring kingdoms in Ancient Greece. The way international sports are conducted and covered today, indicates their potential and ability to bridge gaps between nations. With massive potential to be used as a catalyst in international diplomacy and break barriers, the power of sports can only be as strong as the will and commitment of our global leaders. In an era where hard power is frowned upon by the international community, governments are increasingly inclined to use alternative modes of diplomacy, sports included, to achieve their political goals and shape their international image. If we, the people, can understand the relationship between the two, then we can also influence its impact. This isn’t the first time sports have been used to convey and act upon undertones of conflict and hate, and it unfortunately won’t be the last. For now, we can be aware of how these actions relating to the field of play can be used to condition or influence certain emotions within us, and also pray that our leaders use the pitches and courts to help us come together, rather than to push us apart.

The sky was a pool of black ink, dusted with stars at midnight. Arsh looked out from the window — she saw many little streets sprawled out below. She had only known these streets from inside the walls of her room. She had never walked on them. She had never been under the open sky. She looked at these streets longingly. To her, these streets and everything else of the outside world was a distant dream. Arsh was thinking about him. He came again tonight. Her caramel skin flushed bright pink as he folded her into his arms. Her heart fluttered as his fingertips grazed her bare skin. She had never felt so close to a man before. Over the years, many men held her, touched her, felt her — but he was different from all the others. She fell in love with him. She waited for him each night. She longed for him, as any lover would. On the nights he didn’t come, she was restless. She waited for him till she saw him next, till he told her how beautiful she was. As she stood by the window and watched darkness engulf the sky, she decided she’d tell him what she felt for him. Maybe he’d take her away somewhere far. Maybe he’d relieve her of this life. Overhead, a star blinked in the dark sky, as if telling her it was time. The morning sun filled the brothel. It was bright inside. Arsh slipped into plain white clothes and went downstairs. The morning is always bright. It’s the night that’s dark. It’s always the night that’s dark. “Arsh!” Farnaz called, with a cigarette clenched in the corner of her mouth. “You look happy! I’ve never seen a bigger smile on your face.” “I’m going away,” Arsh said in low voice, so that nobody else could hear. Farnaz laughed. But then her eyes were suddenly wide with concern, and her skin shone pale under the gleam of sunlight. “You know you can’t go away,” Farnaz said quietly. Arsh smiled in reply and bustled away. The rest of the day, she was tangled in her thoughts. She didn’t even know his name but she knew he was the one who’d save her. The world glittered with promise. “Take me away!” Arsh whispered into his ear. There was a steely glint in his eyes. “Please take me away!” Arsh’s voice crackled at the edges. He slapped her so hard her teeth rattled. “You’re a whore,” he spat. Arsh swallowed everything else that she had to say. The words dried up in her throat. It was near dawn but Arsh was wide awake. She looked into the mirror, her dark eyes sunken in an ashen face, stared back at her. Her lips were stained in a dark, blood-like red. Her hair, black and velvety like the sky at midnight, carelessly tumbled down her back. Her angarkha, heavily embroidered in gold and silver threads, danced around her when she moved. 'A whore,' she thought. She felt sparks of resentment cascading in her as she looked at herself. She felt angry. But then her anger melted and she started crying. And as a tear caught in her lip, she realised her lipstick was smudged at the corners. His words filled her head. They were sharp, piercing—they cut through her like knives. Even after he left, the word ‘whore’ twisted inside her. It crushed her. It tinted her entire existence. It was a small word but it encompassed a bitter world — a whore’s world. Arsh had endured years of abuse. There were different men in her bed each night. They treated her like an object. They used her and then discarded her. She was perceived as an unthinking, unfeeling being. Her existence only sparkled in the dark hours of the night. They forgot she was human too. She looked at the faded sky from the window. She spread out her hand towards the sky, trying to reach for it. It was close but far away. Maybe just like the man who she thought would save her. Khudkushi (suicide). The word echoed against the big, bare walls of the brothel. Its weight settled on all women who lived inside. It grew heavier and heavier, thicker and thicker, folding them in, needling them all over. It hung in the air, sharp and poisonous. 'Khudkushi,' they murmured in small voices, afraid not to say it out too loud. They didn’t want anyone else to hear. A silence spread in the brothel, full of fear and anticipation. It was suddenly dark inside, and empty despite the people. Outside, the day shifted from morning to night. And the air smelled of earth and ash and rain. And faintly of death. Arsh took away her life. She cut her wrists and bled to death. For her, death wasn’t just an end—it held meaning. It meant freedom. It meant floating somewhere far, untethered. It meant relief from a corseted existence. Khudkushi became Arsh’s freedom. She finally fled from a life she did not want to live.

I was recently invited to a trip to Iran and Iraq by a group of close friends from Lahore, and as I had never been to these states before, I decided to take the opportunity to visit the shrines frequented mostly by Shia pilgrims. After all, how else was I going to be able to travel through war-torn Iraq (where the Islamic State has only recently been defeated) and gain access to the heavily sanctioned country of Iran? Mesopotamia – the cradle of civilisation and home to many Imams of the Islamic world – has been off-limits to most ordinary tourists since the days of Saddam Hussein. We took off from Lahore and a few hours later found ourselves landing in Baghdad, the famed city of The Arabian Nights. The airport was small and run-down, and we had to wait for at least two to three hours for our group visa to be cleared. We waited patiently and entered Baghdad at dusk; there were palm trees galore and the roads were smooth enough. Our excitement was mounting as we headed straight for the illuminating shrine of Ghous Pak (Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani). We paid our respects at the beautifully lit white shrine, ate the delicious langar (communal meal) of rice and chicken (provided by a Pakistani family from Faisalabad) and then headed to our hotel. We felt more than welcomed to a city founded on the west bank of the Tigris in 762AD by the Abbasid dynasty. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] The beautifully illuminated shrine of Ghous Pak[/caption] [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="450"] The door to his shrine[/caption] [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="419"] His final resting place[/caption] We stayed at Hotel Palestine, which is located near the ancient Tigris River, with a colourful history of its own; it was a favourite among foreign journalists during the Gulf wars and had been shelled! [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] View of the Tigris River from Hotel Palestine[/caption] There are roadblocks all over Iraq and paramilitary forces with armoured vehicles can be seen on all major roundabouts. The receptionist at our hotel smiled and clapped joyfully when she discovered we were Pakistani and gave us comfortable rooms (our recent military standoff seems to have made them happy). Baghdad looks like it is stuck in an 80's time warp – the buildings all seem to be from that era. However, most of the debris from the bombed-out infrastructure has been removed. We found it to be a bustling city with crowded restaurants and bad traffic jams. We crossed the Tigris River many times, the last one being to visit the shrine of Persian mystic Mansur al Hallaj. He is known for his saying, “I am the Truth”, which many saw as a claim to divinity resulting in his execution, while others saw it as an instance of annihilation of the ego. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="450"] The tomb of the Persian mystic[/caption] We also visited the burial place of Abu Hanifa, the founder of the Hanafi school of Sunni jurisprudence. However, the highlight of our Baghdad stay was the visit to the north of the city to Kazmain, where Imams Musa al Kazim (AS) and Muhammad al Jawad (AS), both direct descendants of the Prophet (PBUH), are buried. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Outside the Ziyarat of the Kazmain Imams in Baghdad[/caption] This is a world famous shrine and one of the most important mosques in the Islamic world, with a huge gilded dome and four minarets rising above its courtyard, all covered with gold, Kufic inscriptions. There are canopied balconies, mirror mosaics, glazed tiles, and endless floors of marble. The final resting places of all the Imams buried in Iraq, we were to discover, were equally awe-inspiring. The shrine was very crowded during our visit and there was a long walk to it as it has been bombed in the past, which is why the nearby streets had been cordoned off. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Armoured vehicles and soldiers guarding shrines are a common sight in Baghdad[/caption] The other highlight of our Baghdad visit was to the 2,000-year-old Persian monument Taq Kasra, or Arch of Ctesiphon, the world’s largest brick vault. Somehow it has survived all the recent wars and is truly a sight to see, given its immense scale and elegance. Taq Kasra is located near the shrine of Salman al Farsi (RA), a companion of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and the first Persian to convert to Islam. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="450"] Taq Kasra[/caption] On our last day in Baghdad, we headed to the ancient town of Samarra to visit the 10th and 11th Imams, Ali al Hadi (AS) and his son Hasan al Askari (AS). Both are buried in a heavily-guarded shrine, which has been bombed twice in recent years and had to be rebuilt. Adjacent to the mosque is another domed building built over the cistern where the 12th Imam, Muhammad al Mahdi (AS), disappeared; hence the title of the Mahdi, the Hidden Imam. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] The last place Imam Mahdi was seen[/caption] We were sorry to leave Baghdad – there was much to see and such little time – but we had to move on to Karbala, where rain greeted us. Powerful energy emanates from this city, the burial place of Imam Hussain (RA), the grandson of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), near the place where he was martyred during the Battle of Karbala in 680AD. Within the shrine of Imam Hussain (RA), we found the mass grave of all 72 martyrs of Karbala who fought and died alongside him, despite the heavy odds they faced. We soon joined the thousands of people jostling to enter the Ziyarat. Opposite is the shrine of his brother, Hazrat Abbas (AS), who was also martyred during the Battle of Karbala by Yazid’s men while bringing some water from the Euphrates River for the Prophet’s (PBUH) family. There is a lovely walkway lined with palm trees between the two shrines, and we often went there to sit and pray as our hotel was nearby. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] Hazrat Abbas (AS) shrine glistening as the sun sets in Karbala with the walkway in front[/caption] Our next stop was Najaf, and luckily our hotel was located right next to my favourite Ziyarat: Imam Ali’s (RA) resplendent shrine. He is considered the father of Sufism, as almost all Sufi orders claim their descent from him. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="450"] Imam Ali's (RA) shrine in Najaf[/caption] [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="450"] The entrance to the shrine[/caption] After visiting his peaceful shrine, we went to Kufa to see the great mosque, one of the oldest in the world, where Hazrat Ali (RA) was struck by a poisoned sword and passed away after two days. We visited his simple but elegant house next to the mosque (thankfully preserved by the Iraqi government) where his body was washed before being buried in secret. Imam Ali (RA) had earlier dug a well in his house and even today one can drink its healing waters. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] The Great Mosque of Kufa[/caption] [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] The house in Kufa has been preserved by the Iraqi government[/caption] Our final stop was the city of Mashad in Iran, home of the eighth Imam, Hazrat Ali Reza (AS), whose shrine is really the heart of the city – all roads lead to his Ziyarat! We took a short flight from Najaf to Mashad, which is the second most populous city in Iran. Mashad means the place of martyrdom; Imam Reza (AS) was poisoned by Caliph al Ma’mun. A fact I learned during my journey is that none of the Imams lived to an old age – all were poisoned or assassinated. Imam Reza’s (AS) ornate shrine is enormous, with its many courtyards and mosques, and is considered the Vatican of Iran, run in an efficient and orderly manner. It is also gorgeous, with its Persian carpets and crystal chandeliers galore. We were lucky enough to eat from the shrine’s famous langar and enjoyed the Imam’s hospitality! [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="600"] The underground crypt where people can pray and meditate[/caption] Mashad is a clean, modern city, and feels like it could be anywhere in Europe, except all the women wear long black chadors. Before we knew it, our visit was over, and tired but rejuvenated we found ourselves on the plane back to Lahore. There were so many memories to treasure and so many adventures to retell. Iraq is slowly recovering from war and getting back on its feet, and I would recommend everyone to go visit this fascinating country alongside Iran, regardless of your religious beliefs. As we were told wherever we went, “Ziyarat qubool.” (May your pilgrimage be accepted) (All photos by author)

In the post-modern world, the topography of the city has undergone a drastic shift. Rapid urbanisation and growing job opportunities have resulted in many cities in the developing world being swamped by an increasing number of people coming in from the villages and suburbs. In order to accommodate this burgeoning populace, the intrinsic structure of the modern metropolis has had to evolve. Countries such as India and Pakistan have had to grapple with the dual ambitions of wanting to urbanise their cities while also wanting to hold onto their rich architectural heritage. The complex history of a multi-ethnic country such as Pakistan has been razed to the ground in order to erect soulless towers to replace the colonial monuments which have served as a reminder of our turbulent past. [caption id="attachment_81733" align="alignnone" width="600"] Heritage building encroached on by local traders at Jamia masjid road.[/caption] Rawalpindi is an example of a city wrestling with these two seemingly dichotomous aims. On the outskirts of the Rehmanabad Metro station lie some old houses with large verandas and an edifice which is almost reminiscent of the homes in Downtown Abbey. Erected in the early 1960’s, they adorned the city with their marvellous porticos and the locality came to be known as Satellite Town. During the time that Islamabad was being built as the nation’s new capital, Satellite Town functioned as a diplomatic enclave of sorts, with many embassies located there. The Victorian-style houses were thus built to accommodate foreign dignitaries residing in the city. [caption id="attachment_81748" align="alignnone" width="600"] A night view of Jamia Masjid Rawalpindi which was founded in 1905.[/caption] Over the years, however, as Islamabad became the diplomatic hub, Satellite Town found itself shrinking in importance, and the neighbourhood was consumed by a city which was expanding at an unprecedented rate. The old houses of the locality now stand like ghostly relics of the past. [caption id="attachment_81678" align="alignnone" width="452"] Chan bazaar, Rawalpindi.[/caption] [caption id="attachment_81734" align="alignnone" width="450"] A view of Raja Bazaar road.[/caption] In a house on Sadiqabad road lives an old engineer who has closed the gates of his house, along with his heart, to the outside world. The resident is Afzaal Ahmad, a man who comes from a distinguished family of army personnel. While looking at his old photographs, Ahmad recounts: “The Rawalpindi I was raised in was a marvel, an image straight from the British calendars. Smooth clean roads, small markets, coffee shops along with a nice book shop (London Books company), low traffic and an orderly crowd.” [caption id="attachment_81736" align="alignnone" width="600"] The main entrance of the Afzaal Ahmad's house.[/caption] [caption id="attachment_81737" align="alignnone" width="600"] Old magazine ads from the collection of Afzaal Ahmad.[/caption] [caption id="attachment_81745" align="alignnone" width="600"] Rawalpindi's Kashmir Road in the 1960's. From the records of Afzaal Ahmad.[/caption] The markets at the time were quite small and there was only one major road in Saddar at the time, Mall Road, which catered to everyone's needs. Ahmad recalls that the famous road had a hairdresser, a laundry shop and few clothing outlets as well. He adds: “I remember most of my classmates in Station school were British or Anglo-Indians. Anglo-Indians were considered to be the most educated after the British. I still remember this one Anglo-Indian traffic sergeant who used to roam around alone on Murree road. People were so afraid of his discipline that they wouldn’t cross the road until he had gone away.” [caption id="attachment_81738" align="alignnone" width="600"] Backyard of the house.[/caption] [caption id="attachment_81743" align="alignnone" width="600"] An old building occupied by partition migrants in Saddar.[/caption] For Ahmad’s generation, and the ones which followed, things took a downward turn after Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto came to power. Fearing the consequences of nationalisation and increasing religiosity, many foreigners fled the country. The Anglo-Indians too fell prey to this and many migrated to America and Australia. The resultant vacuum gave rise to a new emerging class of locals who had a different mentality. They were hungry to tear down the old to make way for the new. [caption id="attachment_81744" align="alignnone" width="338"] An old temple in miserable condition in Moti Bazaar.[/caption] [caption id="attachment_81749" align="alignnone" width="475"] A name plate outside a house in Dhakki mohallah, Angat Pura.[/caption] Rawalpindi as a city has always had a storied history. Punjab has been ruled by Graeco-Bactrian Kings and later by the Sakas, Iranian nomads, and in 1765 Sardar Gujjar Singh controlled the area which is now called Rawalpindi. The city remained under Sikh rule till 1849 when it was taken over by the British. Hence, this land has had many identities, and one can find linkages to an extraordinary past through the city’s buildings and districts. [caption id="attachment_81679" align="alignnone" width="600"] A view of Moti bazaar, Rawalpindi.[/caption] Despite the removal of the Sikh Raj, the Sikh community remained an integral part of the cultural fabric of Rawalpindi till 1947. Their remnants are still visible in Kartarpura, Angatpura, Arjun Nagar, Mukha Singh state, Old Banni and adjoining areas. The city was predominantly influenced by Rai Bahadur Sujan Singh whose haveli (house) still stands in the old Bhabra Bazaar. Rawalpindi at one point in time was a jewel, a unique blend of both old and new architecture. Over the years, people that have been allotted these vacant properties have damaged them due to sheer negligence, and today these buildings are but a shadowy reflection of their former glory. [caption id="attachment_81739" align="alignnone" width="600"] An old pre-partition haveli in Saidpuri gate trying to save its colors from the wrath of the modern age.[/caption] [caption id="attachment_81741" align="alignnone" width="600"] A colonial style balcony on College Road, where famous Indian actor Balraj Sahini grew up.[/caption] Rawalpindi today is a chaotic labyrinth. Building laws and municipal regulations are virtually non-existent. Politicians and profit-driven land owners have given local municipal authorities the approval to demolish heritage buildings and sites. Commercialisation has trumped heritage. Heretics have squashed history. Rawalpindi still has the potential to become the epicentre of regional heritage, but only if preservation work is begun immediately. Today, the view from the metro bus offers a gloomy look at a frenzied skyline onto a city which does not know what it wants to be because it has forgotten what it once was. (All photos by author)

It had been some time since I cried while reading a book. And A Place for Us changed that. Fatima Farheen Mirza’s dazzling debut novel tells the story of a South Asian Muslim family living in America. The family members find themselves torn between discovering their individual selves, while also grappling with their respective roles within the family. As a result of living in a deeply polarised American society, the characters in the novel are in a constant battle with themselves, their family and the world around them, each looking to find relevance, liberty and peace. Interestingly, one of the main talking points with regards to this book has been Sarah Jessica Parker's involvement in its publication. The Sexy and the City star chose Mirza’s novel as the first book to be published under the Parker imprint for Hogarth publications. A Place for Us begins at the wedding celebrations for the family’s eldest daughter, Hadia, in California. The occasion, however, is made all the more special due to the youngest child and only son, Amar, coming back home after having fled three years ago. The story thus revolves around the circumstances which led to Amar’s estrangement from the family and the narrative is interspersed with memories from the parents, Rafiq and Layla, and their children, Hadia, Huda and Amar. What I found particularly inventive about the narrative was how the story unfolds through the point of view of a host of different characters, with the same memory often being shown through different perspectives. We are thus able to see how the same moment impacted each member of the family in a wholly unique manner. Mirza beautifully brings to light the nature of familial love, which can be limitless and unwavering, but also envious and petty. The depiction often seems like that of a typical diaspora family, with parents trying desperately to instil both Muslim and South Asian values in their children and encouraging them to speak their native language at home. The author explores the subtle dynamics of the household, from the siblings safeguarding each other’s secrets, to the family following Islamic rituals and customs like fasting in the month of Ramazan and observing Muharram. But that’s just the feel-good part of the book. What is heart-wrenching, poignant, and particularly relevant for our part of the world is how Mirza explores the pressure parents tend to put on their children. South Asian parents often have their own expectations from their children, insisting that they must be obedient, unquestioning Muslims and top performing students who go on to become either doctors, engineers, lawyers or entrepreneurs. The novel attempts to illuminate how pitting children against one another, failing to acknowledge past mistakes and the inability to express love can tear a family apart. Hence, when Amar leaves, a part of Rafiq and Layla’s souls also leaves. But by then it’s too late to mend their broken ways. Perhaps the saddest thing in the world is to see your child leave you because of your own mistakes. Not feeling at home with your own family is a tragedy, one which Mirza renders beautifully on the page. And so, I cried when the family was torn apart because of secrets, betrayals, and the smallest of estrangements which could no longer be brushed under the carpet. The last section of the book, told from Rafiq’s perspective, is absolutely devastating. The feelings of an emotionally-reserved father, who falls prey to his own shortcomings, are expressed in a remarkably raw and affecting manner, which is quite an achievement for a debutant writer. Mirza has done a truly commendable job at penning down the story of a family over decades, and it is no surprise that her novel has received great critical acclaim. The recurrent themes of children trying to find their own identity and parents trying to protect and understand their children resonate at a deep level. After this stellar debut, one hopes that Mirza is able to pack the same amount of authenticity into her next novel, one which I am eagerly awaiting.

“My dear Marwan, I look at your profile, In the glow of this three-quarter moon, my boy, Your eyelashes like calligraphy, Closed in guileless sleep. I said to you, ‘Hold my hand. Nothing bad will happen’.” These are a few verses from the context of Sea Prayer, the fourth book by Khaled Hosseini. Hosseini is a well-known author of three books, including the international bestseller The Kite Runner, and is the Goodwill Ambassador to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Sea Prayer is a 40-page book, or rather, a free verse poem beautifully complemented by Dan Williams’ illustrations. It can best be described as a small prayer to the sea by a helpless father on a moonlit beach, who is going to cross the Mediterranean with his child as soon as dawn arises but in less than ideal circumstances. The story begins with the remembrance of the happy days spent by the father in Homs, Syria when the city was at peace, with its bustling and crowded lanes and streets. Of a time when the stirring of the olive trees and clanking of pots used to awaken him, and when this city of western Syria was not dismantled by bombs, starvation and death. The father wishes for his son to remember some of the more pleasant memories of Homs. The story has been inspired by the three-year-old Syrian boy Aylan Kurdi, whose body washed up by the sea on the shore of Mediterranean Sea in 2015 as he fled the Syrian War. While talking in an interview, Hosseini became teary-eyed even as he remembered seeing the photograph of Kurdi. “I was gutted,” he says. “I tried to imagine, as a father, what it must be like to see viral photographs of your deceased three-year-old lying face down on the sand at the water’s edge and being lifted into the arms of a stranger.” He also stated, “I hope that this book Sea Prayer is a small tribute not only to his (Kurdi’s) family, but also, on a broader level, I hope it highlights the unthinkable despair that thousands of other ordinary people face every day to abandon home and community and take a chance on this brutal and often lethal journey across the sea.” Hosseini thus pays tribute to Kurdi’s family through his Sea Prayer, while portraying the tragic and wretched condition of millions of refugees all over the world with help of Williams’ illustrations. The beautiful memories of Homs are like a dream now, not only for the son but also for the father. Protests followed by the atmosphere of fear and beleaguerment, the black skies showering bombs and bullets instead of rain, and the sight of living bodies buried under devastated buildings is all that remains in their memories of Homs. In Sea Prayer, Hosseini not only points out the way in which the war imposed by mighty powers upon Syria has destroyed the childhood of millions of innocent kids, but also highlights the emergency and the growing crisis of refugees being forced to leave their homes and approach smugglers in search of safe shelters which are in actuality not safe at all. A heartrending letter from a father to his son provokes in us the thought of the thousands of refugees who risk their lives on the threshold of death every year just in search of shelter, while many of them simply perish at sea without leaving anything behind. Every night they sleep among the remains of human flesh burnt by explosive bombs, with their own bodies stained by blood, dreaming of a better future – a hope for a safe shelter, a desire for a home. Carrying their misfortunes, they are longing for acceptance and searching for a place where they are welcomed. But no one cares. Not even the sea. The sea is deep. It is vast. A large swarm of unwelcomed and unasked bodies of flesh are waiting impatiently at the cold beach for the sun to rise. The father sees his son, his only precious cargo, and tries to console his sleeping being with his words, while praying that the sea knows his worth. It kills him every time he thinks of the depth and vastness of the sea and the helplessness of his own self. At this instant, the mother’s voice comes up: “Oh but if they saw, my darling. Even half of what you have. If they only saw. They would say kinder things, surely.” The book will make tears fall out of your eyes silently as the deep ocean engulfs the bodies of thousands of refugees fleeing war and persecution. Some pages are without any words, and here the illustrations speak more powerfully than words ever could. Quietly, they will make your heart wail in silence due to the barbarity of what we call human beings. Humans, the greatest creation ever to be created, that cannot even feel the pain of its fellow beings. Every word, every illustration in this book will leave a deep mark on your heart. The demonstration of the transformation of a peaceful, crowded and bustling Homs into the city of death; no one could have written this better than Hosseini. No words could carve out such an impression on a heart other than his own. This book deserved to be written purely, with a heart that could feel the pain and emotions of thousands of homeless Syrians, Afghans, Somalis and Iraqis. Then who would be better than Hosseini to write it? After all, no one could feel the pain of a refugee better than a refugee himself. As he stated, “If I was a father on a moonlit beach about to take one of these journeys, you can bet that I would... say one of these prayers too.” Sea Prayer is about questioning your own self: what would you have done if you had to abandon your home and cross a deep sea on a cold night? How would you have reacted if you had lost your loved ones in the same sea? Imagine them dead. Imagine their fates being ended as a feast for the sea. Imagine the struggle of their last breaths before they were taken forever. Imagine them being washed up by the sea at the shore itself. How would you have felt? Imagine how a father would have felt to see his three-year-old like this? Hosseini leaves the grave questions for the mighty powers of the world to ponder through his short work of fiction!

Pakistan’s unique geostrategic location at the crossroads of East, South, West, and Central Asia enables it to function as the “Zipper of Eurasia”, as I wrote over half a decade ago in September 2015 for the Russian Institute of Strategic Studies. I built upon this observation in March 2019 to declare that the creative leveraging of the unprecedented trans-regional connectivity potential offered by CPEC enables Pakistan to become the Global Pivot State. This ambitious vision is finally beginning to take shape after Prime Minister Imran Khan and the Uzbekistani Minister of Transport agreed to pursue a trans-Afghan railway line on Wednesday. I previously proposed such a corridor in my April 2019 debut analysis for CGTN about how “CPEC+ Is The Key To Achieving Regional Integration Goals”, which described the northern branch of CPEC through Afghanistan into Central Asia as N-CPEC+ (“N” referring to North). Eventually, this corridor could expand as far northwards as Russia to create a new North-South integration axis across Eurasia which aligns with President Putin’s vision for the Greater Eurasian Partnership (GEP) like I explained in an academic article that I co-authored over the summer that was republished by the prestigious Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). As Pakistan begins to take on a more prominent role in trans-Eurasian integration processes, its strategic importance to both China and Russia will continue to rise. Both Great Powers have a shared interest in the South Asian state fulfilling its destiny to unite the supercontinent through CPEC+. It’s only through this connectivity paradigm that a true Convergence of Civilisations can occur, like I explained in an analysis for CGTN in May 2019. The outcome of Eurasia’s diverse civilisations cooperating on trade and other forms of integration could powerfully discredit Huntington’s infamous prediction about a coming “Clash of Civilisations”. Russian, Chinese, and Pakistani interests are all directly served through N-CPEC+. Moscow’s regional allies can become more internally stable as their economies grow upon securing access to the global markets that this corridor provides through the Indian Ocean, as could Russia’s resource-rich Siberian region. Beijing, meanwhile, will see its Pakistani-based CPEC investments put to use as a springboard for trans-continental integration processes and could also secure contracts to construct parts of its northern branch expansion as well. As for Islamabad, it would financially benefit by having its ports facilitate Central Asian trade with the wider world. N-CPEC+ is therefore more than just a connectivity corridor, it’s a grand strategic concept for the future of intra-Eurasian relations in the emerging Multipolar World Order. Russia, China, and Pakistan are coming closer together as each country realises that they need the others in order to fulfill their shared vision of stability in the supercontinent. In fact, continued movement in this direction might even lead to the creation of a new multipolar trilateral between them to replace the stalled one between Russia-India-China (RIC). The end result could be that a Golden Ring rises between them, Iran, Turkey, and Azerbaijan in the Heartland of Eurasia. To be clear, this won’t happen overnight, but the progress that was just made on agreeing to the Peshawar-Kabul-Mazar-e-Sharif trans-Afghan railway shows that the political will is certainly present to take this vision to its ultimate conclusion with time. Some formidable obstacles still remain, however, such as the unresolved conflict in Afghanistan and the efforts of external powers like India to sabotage this vision. There are also obvious questions of financing and other issues related to project implementation, as well as identifying which companies in the region and beyond are most eager to immediately tap into this project upon its completion. Nevertheless, there are plenty of reasons to remain optimistic, especially since it’s becoming undeniable that Russia and China both appreciate the strategic significance of Pakistan’s N-CPEC+ initiative to their GEP and Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) respectively. In fact, as GEP and BRI continue to synergise their connectivity capabilities, their patron states are realising that N-CPEC+ is indispensable to the success of their joint vision for the supercontinent. This understanding is accelerating trilateral integration between them and therefore leading to one of the most exciting geopolitical developments of the 21st century thus far.

Aun Zara: The perfect family show for Ramazan!

The Burka Avenger versus liberal patriarchy

A psychiatrist’s perspective on gay and transgender persons in Pakistan

Don’t just fret about a channel you dislike, report it to PEMRA!

Pakistani dramas in India, yay!

Why Fawad Khan is so ‘Khoobsurat’!

Why can’t we buckle up?

Rasm-e-Duniya: Why are Pakistani dramas obsessed with weepy women and damsels in distress?

In Ramazan, the piety curtain falls and the ratings go up, but not for Mansha Pasha

With Zidane back on the sidelines, will Real Madrid make the most of the summer transfer window?

Why is the US making a mountain out of the Masood Azhar molehill?

Knock knock! Annabelle is coming home and things are about to get real scary

India’s ‘Operation Isolation’ and the soft power of sports

When khudkushi became her only freedom

Iran and Iraq may not be tourist hot spots, but they offer a spiritual journey like no place else

Rawalpindi: A chaotic labyrinth, caught between heritage and heresy

Raw and poignant, A Place for Us beautifully sheds light on familial love

Sea Prayer by Khaled Hosseini: A father’s lament of the barbarity we call human beings

Is Pakistan’s N-CPEC+ vision finally beginning to take shape?